AFLV was an incredible time spent with everyone from class, and I really enjoyed getting to know everyone so much better than before. And there were many well-spoken presenters that I really enjoyed listening to. I would have to say my favorites were Will Keim and Corey Ciocchetti. I took so many notes, and I was so blog-ready on the bus back! Being the organized individual that I am, I tried to keep it all pretty centralized, so I took all my notes all weekend in my phone... Yep, there's an App for that. So, where I'm going with this is that a day or two after we got back, we had the miraculous OSU snow day of 2010, and then I broke my phone. My biggest loss was all of the notes, quotes, and ideas that I put down in the past week or so! I'm so bummed!
I'll do my best to remember what I wanted to get across.
One thing that caught my attention: the constant effort by everyone to sell something. From this and from the conference in Indianapolis a couple of weeks ago, it really made me think about the motivation behind these presentations. Most presenters seemed genuine, had great things to say, and were really entertaining. But then again, that is their profession. They wouldn't have a job if they weren't entertaining to some extent. Anyway, it just rubbed me the wrong way and distracted me from the material when at one point I heard "...and do you know where you can find resources like that? I'll tell you. I'm giving them to you for ***free***!!! Just check out [insert something like www.YouDrankTheKoolaid.com]!"
In another one, the guy spent the majority of his speech telling me what "the" characteristics of a successful leader are: synonyms for the same characteristics that the previous speaker used, but they were in a different order. To pick on that presentation a bit, the SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) that many of us are familiar with, was apparently not good enough for this guy, so he created his own model: ROPES. I don't even remember what the first 4 letters stand for (had it in my notes), but they are very close to SWOT, and the final "S" is what he claimed really set his model apart. The "S" stands for "Success."
My reaction to that: "Well, isn't that special."
Wanna know the secret to success? Buy my book, pay me to speak at your school, and I'll sell my book to all of your friends. Success!
It's all relative, I suppose.
Anyway, to hop off that rant, I enjoyed the discussions that centered around character and values-based leadership without ever really focusing on "leadership" the whole time. My two favorite speakers didn't really make me think about leadership at all, they made me think about life. One made me think about the lives of prolific artists and musicians, writers and politicians, and I began to compare theirs to my own life. They were working with, generally, the same amount of time in their life (probably less, given the time periods that they lived) that I have. I think the speaker rounded it out to 25,000 days. These were people who really made the most of their lives. They found what they were passionate about, and built their lives around those things.
Corey Ciocchetti talked about priorities. An experience that he had, in which he thought he might have had some sort of fatal brain cancer, is what changed his outlook on life and rearranged his priorities for him. I think this also encouraged him to devote a lot of his time since then to helping others to realize what their true priorities in life are. We get very caught up in things as busy young people. The values of our Fraternities and Sororities, laid out in our Rituals, do not only help to guide us in how we should get along as chapters and behave as gentlemen and ladies inside and outside of our chapters (as I think we have tended to focus most on in our discussions in class), but they also help to remind us what is truly important in life.
Pi Kappa Alpha's Creed, for example, ends with a call to all of its members to: "serve my faith, my family, my community, my alma mater, and my Fraternity." The order of these obligations is what I think represents the priorities of our members. Family is put before any other worldly things. Academic commitments are named before Fraternity commitments, interestingly enough. I also really like that community is named directly after family. This I see as less of an obligation and more of a social responsibility. Collectively, feelings of social responsibility provide the most good for the most people. Be there for the community, and the community will be there for you. Value your priorities. They're in order for a reason.
And now for something completely different. (anybody get that reference?)
This commercial is hilarious... I've seen it so many times, but it never gets old:
What the French, toast?!